4.7 Article

Differential regulation of calcium homeostasis in adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and its Taxol-resistant subclone

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 142, 期 2, 页码 305-316

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705755

关键词

apoptosis; calcium; endoplasmic reticulum; sorcin; chemoresistance; taxol

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R15 HL071520, R15 HL 071520] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Drug resistance is a fundamental problem in cancer chemotherapy. Intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+](i)) may play a role in the development of chemoresistance. We investigated the regulatory role of [Ca2+](i) in Taxol resistance in the non-small-cell lung cancer cell line A549 and its chemoresistant subclone A549-T24. 2 Measurement of cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+](c)) in single cells and cell populations revealed similar levels of basal calcium in the two cell lines. However, a reduced response to thapsigargin (a sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor) in A549-T24 cells compared to the parent cell line suggested a lower ER Ca2+ content in these cells. 3 mRNA expression of SERCA2b and SERCA3, major Ca2+ pumps involved in ER Ca2+ homeostasis, did not significantly differ between the two cell lines, as revealed by RT-PCR. 4 An altered calcium influx pathway in the Taxol-resistant cell line was observed. Modulation of the ER calcium pools using CMC (4-chloro-m-cresol) and ATP revealed lower ryanodine receptor (RyR) and IP3 receptor (IP3R)-sensitive Ca2+ stores in the chemoresistant cell line. 5 Western blot and RT-PCR studies suggested that A549-T24 cells expressed higher levels of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 and the calcium-binding protein sorcin, respectively, in comparison to the parent cell line. Both of these proteins have been previously implicated in chemoresistance, in part, due to their ability to modulate [Ca2+](i). 6 These results suggest that altered intracellular calcium homeostasis may contribute to the Taxol-resistant phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据