4.2 Article

Characterization of bacterial epibionts on the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 1-U119

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame01571

关键词

Trichodesmium; Epibiont; Cyanobacteria; Cultivation-independent; Pelagic microbial community

资金

  1. WHOI Ocean Life Institute
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE-0825407]
  3. Penzance Endowed Fund in Support of Assistant Scientists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in Trichodesmium, a nitrogen-fixing genus of Cyanobacteria, has been fueled by its prominent role in the marine nitrogen cycle. However, it is often overlooked that Trichodesmium occur in the ocean as colonies and are only one member of a complex microbial consortium. In the present study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequences to phylogenetically classify the communities associated with 2 morphological types of Trichodesmium colonies, tufts and puffs, which were collected at the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS) site in the Sargasso Sea. Both Trichodesmium morphotypes were most closely related to T. thiebautii at >= 99% identity. Non-cyanobacterial sequences from both types of colonies were dominated by Flavobacteria, Sphingobacteria, and Alphaproteobacteria. However, the epibiotic communities possessed significantly lower diversity than bacterioplankton; major seawater planktonic taxa, such as the SAR11 clade and Archaea, were conspicuously absent. Moreover, several epibiotic taxa appeared to be novel. Among the tuft or puff 16S rRNA clone libraries constructed in the present study, epibionts sharing common operational taxonomic units at the 97 percent sequence identity (PSI) threshold or higher were not observed, presenting the possibility that these 2 morphologies could select for different epibiotic communities. While our data are representative of a single sample point in time and space, these data suggest that Trichodesmium possess an epibiotic microbial community of relatively low diversity, distinct from that observed in bacterial picoplankton.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据