4.2 Article

Apparent richness and community composition of Bacteria and Archaea in geothermal springs

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 113-122

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame01333

关键词

Bacteria; Archaea; 16S rRNA; Geothermal springs; Greece

资金

  1. Matsumae International Foundation, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA gene diversities of the Polihnitos (89 degrees C), Edipsos (81.8 degrees C), Thermopiles (38.9 degrees C), Eleftheres (41.2 degrees C) and Lagadas (35.2 degrees C) geothermal springs in Greece were investigated. The abundance of prokaryotic cells varied between 0.02 x 10(-5) and 0.92 x 10(-5) cells ml(-1). A total of 227 archaeal and 501 bacterial clones were analysed, which were attributed to 85 and 121 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), respectively. Library clone coverage, based on Good's C estimator, was satisfactory (>75%), except for the Archaea in Thermopiles (similar to 40%) and Eleftheres (similar to 60%) Most of the archaeal phylotypes were related to sequences of yet-uncultivated microorganisms retrieved from terrestrial geothermal springs, deep-sea hydrothermal vents and the Subsurface. A much higher number of bacterial phylotypes was related to cultivated microorganisms from similar environments. The thermophilic nature of most of the discovered phylotypes was also Supported by their high G+C content, which was positively correlated with the springs' tempera tu res. The springs Showed different diversity patterns for Bacteria and Archaea, with Bacteria having higher diversity only in Polihnitos and Lagadas springs. The Shannon diversity index H' showed larger variation for Archaea (0.23 to 3.44) than for Bacteria (1.22 to 3.03) and was unrelated to the prevailing temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen content. Archaeal and bacterial clone libraries respectively contained 50 to 94.1 and 68.8 to 96.2% rare phylotypes (i.e. those that appear only once or twice in the clone library), indicating the importance of rare phylotypes in shaping community diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据