4.2 Article

Phytoplankton-bacterioplankton coupling in a subtropical South Pacific coral reef lagoon

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 221-229

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame01158

关键词

dissolved primary production; bacterial production; DOC; tropical ecosystems; carbon cycling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical coastal ecosystems are often ignored in carbon cycling budgets even though it is now recognised that these ecosystems can be important in terms of coastal carbon cycling. We present results from a series of incubations conducted during a 10 d cruise in the southwest lagoon of New Caledonia, southwestern Pacific, aimed at examining phytoplankton-bacterioplankton coupling. We measured primary production, including dissolved (DPP) and particulate (PPP) primary production, and bacterial production (Bp, H-3-thymidine method) along a gradient. Regardless of inorganic nutrient concentration, we failed to see a tight coupling over the short term (4 h incubation) between net DPP and BP. A negative relationship between BP and the photosynthetic response to light was observed, leading to a decreased Delta BP:DPP ratio with increasing photon flux density. However, when all the data were compiled, BP was correlated with DPP and total primary production. Assuming bacterial growth efficiencies from 1 to 10%, bacterial carbon demand (BCD) was higher than the supply of DPP in the most oligotrophic sites (up to 400 % of DPP). This implies a weaker linkage between bacteria and phytoplankton than previously observed in other oligotrophic sites and requires external subsidies of dissolved organic carbon. In the coastal sites, characterised by higher inorganic and organic matter concentrations, DPP was estimated as being sufficient to support BCD, and bacteria and phytoplankton are considered to be strongly linked. These results were in contrast to previously published results for temperate and polar coastal regions and highlight the differences of these often understudied tropical systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据