4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: A prospective randomized clinical trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1583-1588

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.082

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To prospectively compare standard radiation therapy (RT) with an abbreviated course of FIT in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients and Methods One hundred patients with GBM, age 60 years or older, were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) or a shorter course of RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points were proportionate survival at 6 months, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and corticosteroid requirement. HRQoL was assessed using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br). Results All patients had died at the time of analysis. Overall survival times measured from randomization were similar at 5.1 months for standard FIT versus 5.6 months for the shorter course (log-rank test, P =.57). The survival probabilities at 6 months were also similar at 44.7% for standard RT versus 41.7% for the shorter course (lower-bound 95% Cl, -13.7). KPS scores varied markedly but were not significantly different between the two groups (Wilcoxon test, P =.63). Low completion rates of the FACT-Br (45%) precluded meaningful comparisons between the two groups. Of patients completing RT as planned, 49% of patients (standard FIT) versus 23% required an increase in posttreatment corticosteroid dosage (X-2 test, P =.02). Conclusion There is no difference in survival between patients receiving standard RT or short-course FIT. In view of the similar KPS scores, decreased increment in corticosteroid requirement, and reduced treatment time, the abbreviated course of RT seems to be a reasonable treatment option for older patients with GBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据