4.6 Article

Extended-release venlafaxine in relapse prevention for patients with major depressive disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 249-257

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2003.10.004

关键词

venlafaxine; depression; relapse; prevention; MDD; antidepressant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many studies have demonstrated that venlafaxine is an efficacious and safe treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release (XR) (75-225 mg/day) in the prevention of relapse of depression. Patients with MDD who responded to an 8-week course of venlafaxine XR treatment, i.e., had a score less than or equal to3 on the Clinical Global Impressions scale-Severity of Illness item (CGI-S) and a 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21) score less than or equal to10, were randomly assigned to receive continuation treatment (up to 6 months) with venlafaxine XR (n = 16 1) or placebo (it = 157). The main efficacy outcome measure was the number of patients who experienced a relapse of depression. Relapse was defined by either a combination of a patient meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for MDD and a CGI-S score greater than or equal to4, two consecutive CGI-S scores greater than or equal to4, or a final CGI-S score greater than or equal to4 for a patient who withdrew from the study. The cumulative probability of relapse was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis. During the 6-month evaluation period, significantly more patients in the placebo group had a relapse of MDD than did patients who continued treatment with venlafaxine XR. Cumulative relapse rates at 3 and 6 months were 19 and 28%, respectively, for venlafaxine XR, and 44 and 52%, respectively, for placebo. This study demonstrates that venlafaxine XR is an effective and safe continuation therapy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据