4.5 Article

Caspase-mediated proteolysis of the polyglutamine disease protein ataxin-3

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 908-918

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02369.x

关键词

ataxin-3; caspase; proteolysis; Machado-Joseph disease; polyglutamine disease; spinocerebellar ataxia type-3

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [T32 AG 00214] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS40251A, NS38712, NS0430706] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinocerebellar ataxia type-3, also known as Machado-Joseph Disease, is one of many inherited neurodegenerative disorders caused by polyglutamine-encoding CAG repeat expansions in otherwise unrelated disease genes. Polyglutamine disorders are characterized by disease protein misfolding and aggregation; often within the nuclei of affected neurons. Although the precise mechanism of polyglutamine-mediated cell death remains elusive, evidence suggests that proteolysis of polyglutamine disease proteins by caspases contributes to pathogenesis. Using cellular models we now show that the endogenous spinocerebellar ataxia type-3 disease protein, ataxin-3, is proteolyzed in apoptotic paradigms, resulting in the loss of full-length ataxin-3 and the corresponding appearance of an approximately 28-kDa fragment containing the glutamine repeat. Broad-spectrum caspase inhibitors block ataxin-3 proteolysis and studies suggest that caspase-1 is a primary mediator of cleavage. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments eliminating three, six or nine potential caspase cleavage sites in the protein suggest redundancy in the site(s) at which cleavage can occur, as previously described for other disease proteins; but also map a major cleavage event to a cluster of aspartate residues within the ubiquitin-binding domain of ataxin-3 near the polyglutamine tract. Finally, caspase-mediated cleavage of expanded ataxin-3 resulted in increased ataxin-3 aggregation, suggesting a potential role for caspase-mediated proteolysis in spinocerebellar ataxia type-3 pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据