4.6 Article

Dietary self-selection behaviour by the adults of the aphidophagous ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 478-486

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00822.x

关键词

Aphis fabae Scopoli; Harmonia axyridis Pallas; Myzus persicae Sulzer; prey preference; reproductive capacity; voracity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Harmonia axyridis is a generalist predator with a high range of accepted prey. Prey differ in nutritive contents, energetic values and cost associated with their capture and ingestion. As a result of selection pressures, animals will tend to hunt for their prey efficiently. In this paper we evaluated the suitability of Myzus persicae and Aphis fabae to the adults of the aulica phenotype of H. axyridis, their feeding preferences and the impact of mixed diets on their fitness. Feeding preference of predators was evaluated through their response to different relative abundance of prey. 2. Under a single diet regime, the adults of the aulica phenotype fed on more individuals M. persicae than A. fabae but consumed less biomass from the former. None of those prey affect relative growth rate and reproductive capacity of the ladybeetles. 3. Males and females present different types of response to three levels of different relative abundance of prey. While males show a constant feeding preference for M. persicae, females did not show a feeding preference (i.e. null switching response). Under a mixed diet regime, adults' voracity gradually increased as the proportion of M. persicae increased, but biomass consumed and relative growth rate was not affected. On the other hand, fecundity and fertility increased. 4. Our results suggest that H. axyridis present self-selection behaviour because they agree with the basic criteria of Waldbauer and Friedman's self-selection, i.e. (i) the animal's choice of food or nutrients is non-random, and (ii) the coccinellid benefits from self-selecting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据