4.7 Article

Modulation of PPARα expression and inflammatory interleukin-6 production by chronic glucose increases monocyte/endothelial adhesion

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.zhq0504.2260

关键词

endothelium; monocytes; PPAR alpha; atherosclerosis; interleukin-6

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL55798-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - We have previously reported increased monocyte adhesion to human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) cultured in 25 mmol/L glucose (HG) compared with normal glucose (NG) (5.5 mmol/L). In this study, we explored mechanisms that contribute to increased monocyte adhesion by elevated glucose. Methods and Results - We found that HAECs cultured in HG have increased production of the chemokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). We examined whether IL-6 directly modulated monocyte adhesion to EC. Inhibition of IL-6 using a neutralizing antibody significantly reduced glucose-mediated monocyte adhesion by 50%, and addition of IL-6 directly to human EC stimulated monocyte adhesion. PPARalpha has been reported to negatively regulate expression of IL-6 in vascular cells, so we examined PPARalpha-associated signaling in EC. A known PPARalpha agonist, Wy14,643, prevented glucose-mediated IL-6 production by EC and reduced glucose-mediated monocyte adhesion by 40%. HG-cultured HAEC had a 50% reduction in expression of PPARalpha compared with control EC. Primary aortic EC isolated from PPARalpha knockout ( KO) mice showed increased monocyte adhesion compared with EC isolated from control mice. PPARalpha KO EC also had increased production of IL-6. Finally, we measured IL-6 levels in diabetic db/db mice and found significant 6-fold elevations in IL-6 levels in db/db EC. Conclusions - These data indicate that IL-6 production is increased in diabetes and contributes to early vascular inflammatory changes. PPARalpha protects EC from glucose-mediated monocyte adhesion, in part through regulation of IL-6 production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据