4.6 Article

Combined data from LDL composition and size measurement are compatible with a discoid particle shape

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 954-966

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M300521-JLR200

关键词

atherosclerosis; low density lipoprotein; low density lipoprotein composition; low density lipoprotein structure; low density lipoprotein size; unesterified cholesterol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size of LDL is usually reported as particle diameter, with the implicit assumption that it is a spherical particle. On the other hand, data obtained by cryoelectron microscopy and crystallographic analysis suggest that LDL shape may be discoid. We have investigated LDL particle geometry by combining data on LDL lipid composition with size measurement. The mean LDL diameter of 160 samples was measured by high-performance gel-filtration chromatography (HPGC), and particle volume was calculated from its lipid composition. Assuming a spherical shape, diameters calculated from volume correlated poorly with values obtained by HPGC (R-2 = 0.36). Assuming a discoid shape, particle height was calculated from volume and HPGC diameter. Diameter (20.9 +/- 0.5 nm) and height (12.1 +/- 0.8 nm) were not significantly related to each other (r = 0.14, P = 0.09) and accounted for 23% and 77%), respectively, of the variation in particle volume. In multivariate regression models, LDL core lipids were the main determinants of height (R-2 = 0.83), whereas free cholesterol in the shell, which contributes only 5-9% to LDL mass, was the main determinant of diameter (R-2 = 0.54).jlr We conclude that combined data from composition and size measurements are compatible with a discoid particle shape and propose a structural model for LDL in which free cholesterol plays a major role in determining particle shape and diameter. Teerlink, T, P. G. Scheffer, S. J. L. Bakker, and R. J. Heine. Combined data from LDL composition and size measurement are compatible with a discoid particle shape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据