4.3 Article

Conduction properties of identified neural pathways in the central nervous system of mice in vivo

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 113-122

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2004.02.001

关键词

mouse; conduction velocity; relative refractory period; dorsal column; vestibulospinal tract; reticulospinal tract; pyramidal tract

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various lines of transgenic or knockout mice are now available that have abnormalities in neuron, glial cells or neuron-glial interaction. However. the techniques for quantitative analysis of their pathophysiological functions are still limited. We established an experimental model system to measure the properties of nerve conduction of identified neural pathways in the CNS using anesthetized and immobilized mice. Dorsal column (DC), vestibulospinal/reticulospinal tracts (VRST) and pyramidal tract (PT) were stimulated by inserting stimulating electrodes into the dorsal column nuclei, medial longitudinal fasciculus, and the medullary pyramid, respectively. Volleys were recorded at various segments in the cervical spinal cord with surface electrodes, and their conduction velocities (CVs) and relative refractory periods (RRPs) were measured. The CVs of the DC, VRST and PT were 26.25 +/- 4.96 m/s (n = 7), 51.55 +/- 4.65 m/s (n = 7), 8.89 +/- 1.81 m/s (n = 7), respectively. Data from paired stimulation indicated that the median values of RRPs of the DC, VRST and PT were 10, 2 and 4 ins, respectively, which suggested marked difference among individual tracts. This is the first attempt to measure the conduction properties of the central tracts in mice in vivo. This experimental procedure will give us a physiological measure of CNS functions in normal and genetically manipulated mice and contribute to clarifying the molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and The Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据