4.6 Article

Human leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G are specific inhibitors of C5a-dependent neutrophil enzyme release and chemotaxis

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 316-325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2004.00145.x

关键词

complement; cytokine receptors; inflammation; neutrophils

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating human neutrophils from patients with severe inflammatory disorders such as erysipelas and sepsis are specifically desensitized to complement factor C5a stimulation but not to stimulation with other stimuli like N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (FMLP), interleukin-8 (IL-8), leukotriene B-4 (LTB4), or platelet-activating factor (PAF, 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine). In this study, we raised the question whether factors released from polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) can specifically down-regulate C5a-dependent neutrophil functions. When neutrophils were preincubated with either neutrophil lysates or neutrophil degranulation supernatants, a complete inhibition of C5a-stimulated beta-glucuronidase release and chemotaxis could be observed, whereas FMLP-, IL-8-, LTB4- or PAF-dependent functions were not affected. Serine protease inhibitors like phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, antileukoprotease, or elafin abolished this effect. High-performance liquid chromatography of neutrophil degranulation supernatants revealed pronounced inhibition of C5a-dependent neutrophil functions in fractions exerting elastase or cathepsin G activity, but not in fractions exerting proteinase 3 activity. Using purified human leukocyte elastase (HLE), C5a responses like intracellular calcium influx, beta-glucuronidase release, and chemotaxis were also specifically inhibited. Our experiments show that the release of HLE or cathepsin G from neutrophils specifically down-regulates the responsiveness of neutrophils to C5a. Elastase and cathepsin G may therefore play an important role in the down-regulation of acute inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据