4.4 Article

Mutational analysis of RsbT, an activator of the Bacillus subtilis stress response transcription factor, σB

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 186, 期 9, 页码 2789-2797

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2789-2797.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM048220, GM 48220] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

sigma(B), the stress-activated or factor of Bacillus subtilis, requires the RsbT protein as an essential positive regulator of its physical stress pathway. Stress triggers RsbT to both inactivate the principal negative regulator of the physical stress pathway (RsbS) by phosphorylation and activate a phosphatase (RsbU) required for sigma(B) induction. Neither the regions of RsbT that are involved in responding to stress signaling nor those required for downstream events have been established. We used alanine scanning mutagenesis to examine the contributions of RsbT's charged amino acids to the protein's stability and activities. Eleven of eighteen rsbT mutations blocked sigma(B) induction by stress. The carboxy terminus of RsbT proved to be particularly important for accumulation in Bacillus subtilis. Four of the five most carboxy-terminal mutations yielded rsbT alleles whose products were undetectable in B. subtilis extracts. Charged amino acids in the central region of RsbT were less critical, with four of the five substitutions in this region having no measurable effect on RsbT accumulation or activity. Only when the substitutions extended into a region of kinase homology was sigma(B) induction affected. Six other RsbT variants, although present at levels adequate for activity, failed to activate sigma(B) and displayed significant changes in their ability to interact with RsbT's normal binding partners in a yeast dihybrid assay. These changes either dramatically altered the proteins' tertiary structure without affecting their stability or defined regions of RsbT that are involved in multiple interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据