4.0 Article

Genetic diversity and high proportion of intersubtype recombinants among HIV type 1-infected pregnant women in Kisumu, western Kenya

期刊

AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 565-574

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/088922204323087822

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high genetic diversity of HIV-1 continues to complicate effective vaccine development. To better understand the extent of genetic diversity, intersubtype recombinants and their relative contribution to the HIV epidemic in Kenya, we undertook a detailed molecular epidemiological investigation on HIV-1-infected women attending an antenatal clinic in Kisumu, Kenya. Analysis of gag-p24 region from 460 specimens indicated that 310 (67.4 %) were A, 94 (20.4 %) were D, 28 (6.1 %) were C, 9 (2.0 %) were A2, 8 (1.7 %) were G, and 11 (2.4 %) were unclassifiable. Analysis of the env-gp41 region revealed that 326 (70.9 %) were A, 85 (18.5 %) D, 26 (5.7 %) C, 9 (2.0 %) each of A2 and G, 4(0.9 %) unclassifiable, and 1 (0.2 %) CRF02_AG. Parallel analyses of the gag-p24 and env-gp41 regions indicated that 344 (74.8%) were concordant subtypes, while the remaining 116 (25.2%) were discordant subtypes. The most common discordant subtypes were D/A (40, 8.7%), A/D (27, 5.9 %), C/A (11, 2.4 %), and A/C (8, 1.7 %). Further analysis of a 2.1-kb fragment spanning the gag-pol region from 38 selected specimens revealed that 19 were intersubtype recombinants and majority of them were unique recombinant forms. Distribution of concordant and discordant subtypes remained fairly stable over the 4-year period (1996-2000) studied. Comparison of amino acid sequences of gag-p24 and env-gp41 regions with the subtype A consensus sequence or Kenyan candidate vaccine antigen (HIVA) revealed minor variations in the immunodominant epitopes. These data provide further evidence of high genetic diversity, with subtype A as the predominant subtype and a high proportion of intersubtype recombinants in Kenya.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据