4.4 Article

DNA binding of methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 in human MCF7 cells

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 17, 页码 5011-5021

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0359271

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MeCP2 has been identified as a chromatin-associated protein that recognizes MAR elements as well as methyl-CpGs. To characterize target sequences of MeCP2 in human cells, we employed two complementary methods. First, by use of a preparative chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol, we created from MCF7 cells a library enriched with sequences bound to MeCP2. A total of 154 representative clones were sequenced and analyzed. A large fraction of clones was found to be associated with retrotransposons, mostly with Alu repeats. A subgroup of four clones is derived from putative MARs; one clone is associated with a CpG island, and four clones contain alphoid repeats. Classical satellite DNAs II and III are not represented among clones, although they are heavily methylated. Second, using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, we show that MeCP2 staining of human metaphase chromosomes has a dotted to knobby appearance with a reduced level of staining of centromeric regions of some chromosomes. On the other hand, an anti-5-methylcytosine antibody preferentially stained the juxtacentromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 9, and 16, which habor highly methylated, classical satellite DNAs, and methylated alphoid sequences in centromeric regions of several other chromosomes with reduced intensity. In interphase MCF7 cells, the distribution of MeCP2 exhibits a granular appearance throughout the nucleus. This distribution does not parallel that of methylated cytosine and heterochromatin. The selective binding behavior of MeCP2 revealed by these results (preference for murine major satellite DNA, Alu sequences, MARs, and CpG islands) is explained by its ability to recognize the sequence information (guanine bases) adjacent to CpG (TpG) as demonstrated in previous footprinting experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据