4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Associations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and very high levels of measles antibody following vaccination

期刊

VACCINE
卷 22, 期 15-16, 页码 1914-1920

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.016

关键词

measles vaccine; humoral immunity; HLA genes

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-00585-25] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01-2AI-33144, N01-AI-45240] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Associations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes and very high levels of antibodies (or hyperseroresponsiveness) to measles antigens in a genetically heterogeneous human population are poorly understood. We studied the association between antibody levels after measles vaccination and HLA class I and II alleles among 170 US schoolchildren who received one dose of measles-mumps-rubella 11 vaccine. Vaccine recipients were divided into two groups: 93 recipients who were seropositive and 77 recipients who were hyperseropositive (the upper 10th percentile of antibody levels of all subjects). Out of all the alleles analyzed, HLA-B*7 (odds ratio (OR) 1.9; P = 0.05), DQA1*0104 (OR 4.6; P = 0.02) and DPA1*0202 (OR 4.8; P = 0.04) alleles were positively associated with hyperseropositivity, whereas HLA-B*44 (OR 0.4; P = 0.02), DRB1*01 (OR 0.6; P = 0.09), DRB1*08 (OR 0.3; P = 0.04), DQB1*0301 (OR 0.5; P = 0.04), and DPB1*0401 (OR 0.6; P = 0.03) alleles were negatively associated with hyperseropositivity. The alleles B*44, DRB1*01, DRB1*08 and DQA1*0104 remained statistically significant after accounting for the effects of other alleles. The results suggest that HLA alleles have important associations with measles antibody hyperseropositivity. These data increase our understanding of measles vaccine-induced immune response and will be useful for future mechanistic work on measles virus antigen processing and presentation in seronegative and hyperseropositive individuals. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据