4.4 Article

Djeyes absent (Djeya) controls prototypic planarian eye regeneration by cooperating with the transcription factor Djsix-1

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 269, 期 2, 页码 346-359

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.01.042

关键词

planarians; regeneration; eye; central nervous system; eyes absent; six-1; RNAi; in situ hybridization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A conserved network of nuclear proteins is crucial to eye formation in both vertebrates and invertebrates. The finding that freshwater planarians can regenerate eyes without the contribution of Pax6 suggests that alternative combinations of regulatory elements may control the morphogenesis of the prototypic planarian eye. To further dissect the molecular events controlling eye regeneration in planarians, we investigated the role of eyes absent (Djeya) and six-1 (Djsix-1) genes in Dugesia japonica. These genes are expressed in both regenerating eyes and in differentiated photoreceptors of intact adults. Through RNAi studies, we show that Djsix-1 and Djeya are both critical for the regeneration of normal eyes in planarians and genetically cooperate in vivo to establish correct eye cell differentiation. We further demonstrate that the genetic interaction is mediated by physical interaction between the evolutionarily conserved domains of these two proteins. These data indicate that planarians use cooperatively Djsix-1 and Djeya for the proper specification of photoreceptors, implicating that the mechanism involving their evolutionarily conserved domains can be very ancient. Finally, both Djsix-1 and Djeya double-stranded RNA are substantially more effective at producing no-eye phenotypes in the second round of regeneration. This is probably due to the significant plasticity of the planarian model system, based on the presence of a stable population of totipotent stem cells, which ensure the rapid cell turnover of all differentiated cell types. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据