4.4 Article

Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 362, 期 1, 页码 65-69

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.059

关键词

trigeminal; CO2; mechanosensory; chemosensory; event-related; potentials; intensity; retronasal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is evidence that functionally different areas can be distinguished within the nasal mucosa with regard to stimulation site and stimulus properties. The aim of the present study was the comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical measures obtained in response to mechanical and chemosomatosensory stimulation of two different regions of the nasal mucosa. A total of 40 volunteers participated in this study (age range 21-36 years). Chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using gaseous CO2 as stimulant, while somatosensory ERPs were recorded in response to intranasal mechanical stimuli (air puffs). Stimuli were released to the anterior portion and to the posterior portion of the nasal cavity. A significant interaction between stimulus properties and site of stimulation could be detected after analysis of ERP parameters and intensity ratings. Thus, the chemosensory stimulus was perceived as stronger in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity whereas this was not the case for mechanosensory stimuli. In addition, mechanosensory stimuli were found to evoke ERPs with shorter latencies. These results underline the idea that the respiratory mucosa should not be seen as a homogeneous tissue. It exhibits varying sensitivities to trigeminal stimulation depending on stimulus quality and site of stimulation. Hence, perception of chemosensory stimuli seems to be most accurate in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity, while sensitivity to mechanical stimuli appears to be highest in the posterior portion. In addition, these differences within the respiratory mucosa may contribute to differences in the perception of orthonasal and retronasal odorous stimulation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据