4.7 Article

Telomere length and human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression as markers for progression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 1807-1814

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.160

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Maintenance of telomeres through reactivation of telomerase is a prerequisite for tumors to preserve their ability to proliferate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate telomere length and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression as markers for progression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Patients and Methods Telomere length and hTERT expression were analyzed in matched cancer and adjacent noncancer mucosa samples from 57 patients with R0-resected colorectal carcinoma. The median follow-up time was 76 months. Results Telomere length and hTERT expression correlated significantly in cancer tissues and adjacent mucosa samples (r = 0.52, P < .001; and r = 0.54, P < .001, respectively). Overall, cancer tissue had shorter telomeres than adjacent mucosa (P < .001). Only in noncancer tissue did telomere length decrease with age (r = 0.36; P < .01). Telomere length in cancer tissue was significantly correlated with tumor stage (P < .01), with longer telomeres in advanced tumors. Patients with ratios of telomere length in cancer to noncancer tissue greater than 0.90 had a significantly poorer overall survival compared with patients with smaller telomere length ratios (P < .002). In multivariate analysis, the telomere length ratio proved to be of independent prognostic value (P < .03). Conclusion Telomeres in colorectal carcinoma tissue were significantly shorter compared with adjacent normal mucosa as an indication for extensive cell proliferation. The correlation with tumor stage and patient survival suggest that hTERT-mediated telomere stabilization may be critical for progression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据