4.7 Article

The Arg451Cys-neuroligin-3 mutation associated with autism reveals a defect in protein processing

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 24, 期 20, 页码 4889-4893

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0468-04.2004

关键词

neuroligin; neurexin; autism; cell adhesion proteins; thiol-retention; trafficking

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR004050, P41 RR04050] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P42 ES010337, P42-ES-10337] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R37 GM018360, R37 GM-18360] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuroligins are a family of postsynaptic transmembrane proteins that associate with presynaptic partners, the beta-neurexins. Neurexins and neuroligins play a critical role in initiating formation and differentiation of synaptic junctions. A recent study reported that a mutation of neuroligin-3 (NL3), an X-linked gene, was found in siblings with autistic spectrum disorder in which two affected brothers had a point mutation that substituted a Cys for Arg451. To characterize the mutation at the biochemical level, we analyzed expression and activity of the mutated protein. Mass spectrometry comparison of the disulfide bonding pattern between the native and the mutated proteins indicates the absence of aberrant disulfide bonding, suggesting that the secondary structure of the mutated protein is conserved. However, the mutation separately affects protein expression and activity. The Cys mutation causes defective neuroligin trafficking, leading to retention of the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. This, in turn, decreases the delivery of NL3 to the cell surface. Also, the small fraction of protein that reaches the cell membrane lacks or has markedly diminished beta-neurexin-1 (NX1beta) binding activity. Other substitutions for Arg451 allow for normal cellular expression but diminished affinity for NX1beta. Our findings reveal a cellular phenotype and loss of function for a congenital mutation associated with autistic spectrum disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据