4.5 Article

New species in aquaculture: are the striped venus clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) and the surf clam Spisula solida (Linnaeus 1758) potential candidates for diversification in shellfish aquaculture?

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 1327-1340

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12593

关键词

Spisula solida; Chamelea gallina; spawning induction; larval rearing; juveniles

资金

  1. PROMAR Project (Interreg IIIA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surf Spisula solida and the striped venus Chamelea gallina clams support important fisheries in Europe. These fisheries have been affected by inter-annual fluctuations in stock abundance and recruitment failures. Aquaculture could contribute to address these problems through the production of larvae or juveniles for stock-enhancement programmes. In the present study, the prerequisites to produce these species in hatchery were established. Of the different methods used to obtain gametes (thermal stimulation, scarification and flow through), C. gallina spawned in the flow through only. By its turn, the best method for obtaining gametes for S. solida was stripping. Higher survivals of D-larvae were found at 15 and 17 degrees C. The greatest larval survival and growth rates were obtained from larvae fed Isochrysis aff. galbana (T-iso). First C. gallina and S. solida pediveliger larvae were found at day 8 and day 26 respectively. The presence of metamorphosed larvae found even in the unfed treatment for C. gallina and for S. solida is an advantage for aquaculture production. After metamorphosis, the S. solida juveniles' survival was quite low, whereas there was no mortality for C. gallina juveniles reared without substrate regardless the diet provided. Juveniles fed the binary diet (Chaetoceros calcitrans - C. cal + T.iso) and the monodiet T-iso showed relatively higher growth in shell length and weight than C. cal. The hatchery production of these two species was possible, however the results of this study showed that C. gallina can be more attractive for aquaculture than S. solida.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据