4.5 Article

Broodstock diet with water and astaxanthin improve condition and egg output of brood fish and larval survival in Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L.

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 819-829

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12540

关键词

astaxanthin; water; broodstock diet; condition; egg output

资金

  1. Ministry of the Fisheries and Coastal Affairs of the Royal Norwegian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Broodstock of Atlantic cod were fed with three diets; astaxanthin supplemented (100ppmkg(-1)) hydrated diet (30% water) (HWHAs), no additional astaxanthin supplemented (50ppmkg(-1)) hydrated diet (30% water) (HWLAs) and a control diet (50ppmkg(-1) astaxanthin and 10% water). Throughout the spawning period, eggs were collected daily and fertilization success and proportion of embryos with normal cleavage were recorded. Larvae were reared using standard culture methods. Larval growth was recorded every 10days and larval survival was recorded at 50days post hatch. In general, broodstock fed with diets containing higher water content (HWHAs and HWLAs) and higher astaxanthin (HWHAs) had higher egg production and efficiency of egg output, lower egg incubation mortality and higher larval growth and survival. Broodstock fed with higher water content diets consumed less feed compared to control group. Also, broodstock fed with HWHAs and HWLAs recovered faster in terms of body condition than the control group. The egg bound mortality of female fish was significantly higher in control broodstock compared to broodstock fed with HWHAs and HWLAs. Broodstock fed with higher astaxanthin (HWHAs) had significantly higher fertilization success than other two groups however; no differences were found in proportion embryos with normal cleavage among different groups. Larval survival was significantly higher in HWHAs broodstock compared to other two groups. Our results showed that increased water content and astaxanthin levels in the diet could improve the condition and fecundity of Atlantic cod broodstock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据