4.5 Article

Microcalorimetry, energetics and binding studies of DNA-dimethyltin dichloride complexes

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 414, 期 2, 页码 233-241

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2004.01.007

关键词

DNA; dimethyltin dichloride; enthalpy change; binding sites analysis; microcalorimetry; noncompetitive interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction of dimethyltin dichloride (Me2SnCl2) with calf thymus DNA was studied at 27 degreesC, pH 7.6 using various techniques including isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and UV-Vis, fluorescence and IR spectrophotometries. The binding isotherm and enthalpy curve for Me2SnCl2-DNA interaction was a biphasic transition process. This was determined by the analysis of the binding data with the Hill equation. The first phase of the enthalpy curve (exothermic process) was consistent with the first set of binding site, the second phase (endothermic process, less exothermicity) was consistent with second set of binding site from the cited interactions. Our results showed that the first set of binding sites is occupied by one mole of ligand bound per near 1 base pair of DNA. The DNA-ethidium bromide (EB) complex, in the presence of Me2SnCl2, caused the quenching of the fluorescence emission. The Scatchard plots illustrated a non-intercalating manner for such quenching. The DNA-EB complex results indicated that the binding of Me2SnCl2 is with the phosphate groups of DNA at low ligand concentrations (<9 mM). This was confirmed with the IR spectrophotometric spectra. However, the binding at higher ligand concentrations (>9 mM) was with the base groups of DNA. Therefore, these results suggest that the Me2SnCl2 binding to DNA at low concentrations occurs through an outside interaction by an exothermic process. However, the partial unfolding of the DNA caused at higher concentrations of Me2SnCl2 is through an endothermic process involving interactions with the base groups. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据