4.7 Article

Linked landscapes - Creating greenway corridors through conservation subdivision design strategies in the northeastern and central United States

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 68, 期 2-3, 页码 241-269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00157-9

关键词

conservation subdivisions; open space network; four-step design process; growing greener; landscape planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very broadly conceived, greenways can encompass extensive areas comprising natural and cultural landscapes such as prime farmland and upland habitat, in addition to linear elements such as stream valleys or environmentally sensitive lands which are unfit for development due to wetness, floodability, or steepness. Local land-use regulations can be written and implemented to pre-identify potential open space within each new residential subdivision in such a manner that every development contributes a segment to the community-wide conservation network envisioned in its comprehensive planning documents. These reservations can easily comprise 40-70% of the buildable land within each new neighborhood, a major distinction setting this approach apart from previous clustering techniques-which were rarely utilized in any coordinated way to preserve interconnected open space networks. This approach augments the contributions of the planning profession with critical insights from the field of landscape architecture by institutionalizing basic principles of site assessment, planning, and design in new model zoning and subdivision ordinance language. Those recommended regulatory provisions can then be adopted by local governments in developing areas at the edges of expanding metropolitan regions, a process that can be enhanced and accelerated through education programs for local officials. The advantages of this approach lie in its economy, administrative ease, fairness to landowners, and political acceptance, which combine to make it potentially one of the most promising physical planning techniques to emerge in recent decades. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据