4.5 Article

Silver catfish Rhamdia quelen immersion anaesthesia with essential oil of Aloysia triphylla (L'Herit) Britton or tricaine methanesulfonate: effect on stress response and antioxidant status

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 1061-1072

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12043

关键词

MS222; Aloysia triphylla; anaesthetic; physiological impact; Rhamdia quelen

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul/Programa de Apoio a Nucleos de Excelencia (FAPERGS/PRONEX)
  2. Comissao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Tecnologico (CNPq)
  4. CNPq
  5. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Responses to anaesthesia with essential oil (EO) of Aloysia triphylla (135 and 180mgL(-1)) and tricaine methanesulfonate (MS222) (150 and 300mgL(-1)) were assessed in silver catfish. Exposure to the anaesthetics elicited a stress response in the species. In the case of MS222, it was displayed as a release of cortisol into bloodstream, elevation in hematocrit and plasma ion loss. The EO presented cortisol-blocking properties, but increased haematocrit and disturbances of hydromineral balance were observed. Liver antioxidant/oxidant status of EO and MS222-anaesthetized silver catfish was also estimated. The synthetic anaesthetic induced lipoperoxidation, notwithstanding increased catalase contents, whereas the naturally occurring product was capable of preventing the formation of lipid peroxides, possibly due to combined actions of catalase and glutathione-S-transferase. Anaesthetic efficacy was also tested via induction and recovery times. Overall, the promising results obtained for the physiological parameters of the EO-treated fish counterbalanced the slight prolonged induction time observed for 180mgL(-1). As for 135mgL(-1), both induction and recovery times were lengthy; despite that, the EO was able to promote oxidative protection and mitigate stress. None of the MS222 concentrations prompted such responses concomitantly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据