4.3 Article

Effects of Prereactivation Propranolol on Cocaine Craving Elicited by Imagery Script/Cue Sets in Opioid-dependent Polydrug Users: A Randomized Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 491-498

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000169

关键词

cocaine; cue-induced craving; imagery scripts; memory reconsolidation; propranolol

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health
  2. NIDA [DA-020647]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Relapse to drug misuse may follow exposure to drug cues that elicit craving. The learned associations, or emotional memories,'' that underlie responses to cues may be attenuated or erased by the beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol during a reconsolidation window'' shortly after the memories are reactivated by cues. Methods: We evaluated the effects of propranolol on cue-induced drug cravings in healthy opioid-dependent individuals who used cocaine while receiving methadone maintenance (n = 33). Participants were asked to recall specific cocaine use and neutral events in an interview; these events were used to develop personalized auditory script/cue sets. Approximately 1 week later, propranolol (40 mg) or placebo (random assignment, double blind) was administered orally before presentation of the script/cue sets; the presentation of the script/cue sets were tested 1 week and 5 weeks after the propranolol/placebo session. Ongoing drug use was monitored via urine screens and self-report in twice-weekly visits. Results: Cue reactivity, as assessed by craving scales and physiological responses, was unexpectedly greater in the propranolol group than in the placebo group. This counterhypothesized group difference was present acutely during propranolol administration and seemed to persist (without reaching statistical significance) during the subsequent test sessions. Conclusions: Our results do not support the use of propranolol for cue-induced cocaine craving in opioid-maintained patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据