4.7 Article

The longitudinal relationship of hemoglobin, fatigue and quality of life in anemic cancer patients: results from rive randomized clinical trials

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 979-986

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh235

关键词

anemia; fatigue; neoplasms; quality of life

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Anemia is common in cancer and has been associated with fatigue and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We report the association between hemoglobin and fatigue and the impact of reducing fatigue on several domains of HRQOL. Patients and methods: These analyses were based on five randomized trials. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Anemia scales and numeric rating scales of Energy, Activity and Overall Health at baseline and after the 12-week treatment period. t-tests and linear regression models were used to evaluate associations. Analyses were stratified into three groups: solid tumor chemotherapy patients, lymphoproliferative malignancy chemotherapy patients and non-chemotherapy patients. Results: Adjusted mean differences (95% CI) in FACT Fatigue change scores between hemoglobin responders (greater than or equal to2 g/dl increase) and non-responders were 3.0 (1.2, 4.7), 2.8 (0.6, 5.0) and 5.8 (2.2, 9.5) among the solid tumor, lymphoproliferative malignancy and non-chemotherapy groups, respectively. Significantly greater improvements (P < 0.01) were observed in the FACT well-being scales for patients with meaningful improvement in fatigue (FACT Fatigue change score greater than or equal to3 points). After controlling for other factors, patients whose fatigue improved reported substantially greater improvements in energy, ability to perform usual activities and overall health (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Across five trials of cancer patients on and off chemotherapy, hemoglobin response was associated with meaningful improvements in fatigue, which, in turn, was associated with improved physical, functional, emotional and overall well-being.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据