4.5 Article

Effect of vitamin A on the skeletal morphogenesis of European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758)

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 684-692

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02676.x

关键词

retinol; phenotypic plasticity; limb asymmetry; fish

资金

  1. FINEFISH (EU) [012451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of vitamin A levels in the larval diet of Dicentrarchus labrax, (a) on the shape of juvenile skeleton and (b) on the development of pelvic fins. To exclude the side-effects of skeletal abnormalities on skeleton shape, morphometric analysis was performed on normal individuals only. Geometric morphometric analysis revealed a significant effect of larval nutrition on the shape of juvenile skeleton (Wilk's lambda=0.0188, P < 0.001), 55 days after the application of the different nutritional regimes. Between-groups shape differences mainly concerned the position of anterior dorsal pterygiophore, which was associated with a significant (P < 0.05) increase of the number of dorsal lepidotrichia and hard spines at low levels of vitamin A (3-9 x 103 IU kg-1 dry food). At the lowest vitamin A levels (3 x 103 IU kg-1 dry food), the development of pelvic fins was abnormal, with severe bilateral (44 +/- 10%, mean +/- SD) or unilateral (22 +/- 9%) lack of the fin lepidotrichia, hard spines and their supporting elements. In the 82-94% of the unilaterally deformed individuals, deformation concerned the left pelvic fin. Concerning the shape of pelvic fins in the normally developed individuals, results demonstrated a significant effect of nutritional conditions on the size and position of all the elements of the pelvic fin area (basipterygium, lower metacleithrum, cleithrum, scapula) (Wilk's lambda=0.3087, P < 0.001). Our results demonstrate a significant nutritionally driven phenotypic plasticity in D. labrax, with dietary levels of vitamin A determining the skeleton shape and the left-right symmetry of pelvic fins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据