4.5 Article

Biochemical parameters of blood plasma and content of microcystins in tissues of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) from a hypertrophic pond with cyanobacterial water bloom

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 15, 页码 1683-1693

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02285.x

关键词

biochemical profile of blood; microcystins; common carp

资金

  1. National Agency for Agricultural Research [QH71015]
  2. Research Project of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic 'Veterinary aspects of food safety and quality' [MSM 62 15712402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of the blood plasma parameters and the content of microcystins in the tissues of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in relation to the toxic cyanobacterial water bloom. Fish (average body mass 2176 +/- 697 g) in the hypertrophic pond were exposed to natural water bloom (dominated by Planktothrix agardhii, Pseudanabaena limnetica and Limnothrix redekei), which contained microcystins (concentration in biomass 20-181 mu g g-1 dry wt, concentration in water 0.3-9.5 mu g L-1). Biochemical parameters in fish blood plasma were analysed in 89 fish at 14-day intervals during the whole season (nine sampling periods). Our results demonstrated high variability and fluctuations in the investigated parameters. The content of microcystins and density of cyanobacterial cells correlated with some haematological indices as lipase, alanine-aminotransferase, albumin, magnesium and chlorides. The concentrations of microcystins in the muscle and liver of the fish (determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometer) were below the limit of detection during the monitored period [0.31 ng g-1 fresh weight (f.w.) for the liver and 0.13 ng g-1 f.w. for muscle]. Our study demonstrates that although known cyanobacterial toxin microcystins were not detected in the fish tissues, several biochemical parameters important for the fish physiology were modulated by natural cyanobacterial bloom.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据