4.7 Article

Foliar fertilization to control iron chlorosis in pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 263, 期 1-2, 页码 5-15

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047717.97167.d4

关键词

acidic foliar applications; foliar fertilization; iron chlorosis; iron deficiency; pear; Pyrus communis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effectiveness of foliar fertilization to re-green chlorotic leaves in iron-deficient pear trees has been studied. Trials were made to assess the influence of (i) the level of Fe deficiency, (ii) the leaf surface treated (adaxial or abaxial), and (iii) two different surfactants, L-77 and Mistol. Treatments were ferrous sulphate alone, ascorbic, citric and sulphuric acids, applied either alone or in combination with ferrous sulphate, Fe-DTPA and water as a control. Solutions were applied with a brush and leaves were treated twice each year. None of the treatments caused a full recovery from Fe deficiency chlorosis. Treatments containing Fe caused the largest re-greening effects, and FeSO(4) had a similar re-greening effect to Fe(III)-DTPA. Increases in leaf Chl were more pronounced with abaxial leaf surface applications and in severely deficient leaves. Using Fe(III)-DTPA in foliar sprays does not seem to be justified, since their effects are not better than those of FeSO(4). The joint use of Fe(III)-DTPA and L-77 and that of FeSO(4) and citric acid do not seem to be suitable. With a single foliar application, FeSO(4) combined with acids gave slightly better results than FeSO(4) alone. Acidic solution applications without Fe may be effective in alleviating chlorosis in some cases, especially in the case of citric acid. In the current state of knowledge, foliar fertilization cannot offer yet a good alternative for full control of Fe chlorosis, although its low environmental impact and cost make this technique a good complementary measure to soil Fe-chelate applications and other chlorosis alleviation management techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据