4.6 Article

Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkages in headwater streams

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 721-734

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01219.x

关键词

allochthonous resources; deforestation; food web subsidies; riparian buffers; stable isotopes; terrestrial-aquatic linkages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. We assessed the impacts of deforestation on the energy base of headwater food webs in seven headwater streams in the Upper Chattahoochee basin, GA, U.S.A where percentage forest in catchments ranged from 82 to 96%. We measured terrestrial organic matter standing crop and determined consumer (crayfish and insectivorous fish) dependence on terrestrial versus aquatic energy sources via gut content and stable isotope analyses. 2. Standing crop of coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) declined with deforestation at large scales (i.e. catchment deforestation and riparian deforestation at the entire stream network scale). Terrestrial plant matter, the dominant component of crayfish guts, declined in crayfish guts with reductions in CPOM standing crop and with deforestation. 3. Crayfish and insectivorous fish delta(13)C showed enrichment trends with deforestation, indicating isotopic divergence from CPOM, the most C-13-depleted basal resource, with reductions in catchment and riparian forest cover. Crayfish delta(13)C also exhibited enrichment with decreased instream CPOM standing crop. 4. A concentration-dependent mixing model was used to calculate the relative dependence of crayfish and fish on terrestrial versus aquatic basal resources. Results suggested that both allochthonous CPOM and autochthonous production were important basal resources. Consumer dependence on CPOM decreased with reductions in canopy cover. 5. Our data suggest the importance of forest cover to headwater food webs at multiple scales, and that relatively low levels of riparian deforestation along headwater streams can lead to reductions in stream food web dependence on terrestrial subsidies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据