4.5 Article

Effect of dietary lysozyme on growth, immune response intestine microbiota, intestine morphology and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophilia in gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)

期刊

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 229-241

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/anu.12069

关键词

Aeromonas hydrophilia; Carassius auratus gibelio; immunity; intestine microbiota; intestine morphology; lysozyme

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program (NKBRP) [2009CB118702]
  2. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-46-19]
  3. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201003020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 75days experiment was conducted in a flow-through system on juvenile gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) (3.43 +/- 0.01g) to evaluate the effects of dietary lysozyme on growth performance, intestine morphology, microbiota and immune response. Four isonitrogenous (crude protein: 367 g kg(-1)) isolipid (62 g kg(-1)) and isocaloric (gross energy: 17.92kJg(-1)) diets were formulated to contain 0, 100, 500 and 1000mgkg(-1) lysozyme, respectively. The results showed that specific growth rate (SGR) and feed efficiency (FE) increased at 1000mgkg(-1) lysozyme. Blood leucocyte phagocytic activity (PA) and serum lysozyme (LZM) decreased with dietary lysozyme on day 25, 50 and 75. There were no significant differences in alternative complement pathway (ACP), respiratory burst (ROS), serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSHpx) or malonaldehyde (MDA). After Aeromonas hydrophilia challenge, higher survival was obtained at 500mgkg(-1) group. PA, ROS, SOD, LZM and ACP increased with increasing dietary lysozyme, while MDA reversed. Goblet cells in mid-intestine and microvilli height in distal intestine increased with dietary lysozyme on day 75. Dietary lysozyme reduced the diversity of intestine microbiota. In conclusion, oral administration of 500mgkg(-1) dietary lysozyme for 75days is recommended for the survival of gibel carp and 1000mgkg(-1) dietary lysozyme for fast growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据