4.7 Article

Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis

期刊

BRAIN
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 1361-1369

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh153

关键词

MRS, NAWM; myo-inositol; multiple sclerosis; clinically isolated syndromes

资金

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society [748] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in established multiple sclerosis has been shown to be abnormal using a variety of magnetic resonance (MR) techniques, including proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS), although the stage at which these changes first appear is less clear. Using a 1.5 T scanner and single-voxel (1)H-MRS [TR 3000 ms, TE 30 ms, point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) localization], we determined NAWM metabolite concentrations in 96 patients a mean of 19 weeks (range 12-28 weeks) after onset of a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of multiple sclerosis and in 44 healthy control subjects. Absolute concentrations of N-acetyl-aspartate, total creatine and phosphocreatine (Cr), choline-containing compounds, glutamate plus glutamine, and myo-inositol (Ins) were estimated automatically using the LCModel. Compared with control subjects, the concentration of Ins was elevated in CIS NAWM (mean 3.31 mM, SD 0.86 versus mean 3.82 mM, SD 1.06; P = 0.001). The increase in Ins was also seen in the patient subgroup with abnormal T2-weighted MRI (mean 3.88 mM, SD 1.10; P = 0.001) and in those who satisfied the McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (mean 4.04 mM, SD 1.31; P = 0.001). An increase in Cr was also observed in CIS NAWM (P = 0.023), but other metabolites did not significantly differ between the whole CIS group and control subjects. There was no significant correlation between NAWM Ins and T2 lesion load. The early increase in Ins may reflect a process of pathogenic importance in multiple sclerosis NAWM. Follow-up studies will investigate whether the increase in NAWM Ins is of prognostic importance for future relapses and disability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据