4.2 Article

In vitro antitumour activity of resveratrol in human melanoma cells sensitive or resistant to temozolomide

期刊

MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 189-196

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.cmr.0000130007.54508.b2

关键词

melanoma cells; resveratrol; temozolomide; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resveratrol, a polyphenol present in many plant species, exhibits a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities both in vitro and in vivo. It has been shown to exert a potent chemopreventive effect in carcinogenesis models and to induce cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in human tumour cells, including melanoma cells. Malignant melanoma is considered to be a chemotherapy-refractory tumour, and the commonly used anticancer drugs do not seem to modify the prognosis of metastatic disease. To further evaluate the therapeutic potential of resveratrol in the treatment of melanoma, we selected three human melanoma cell lines with different levels of resistance to temozolomide (TMZ), an antitumour triazene compound. The cell lines were subjected to resveratrol treatment and analysed for cell growth inhibition, cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis induction. We found that resveratrol markedly impaired proliferation of both the TMZ-sensitive M14 and the TMZ-resistant SK-Mel-28 and PR-Mel cell lines. The latter cell line was two-fold more resistant to the drug than M14 and SK-Mel-28 cells. The sensitivity of normal human keratinocytes to resveratrol was found to be significantly higher than that of M14 and SK-Mel-28 cells and similar to that of the PR-Mel cell line. This suggests a possible good in vivo therapeutic index for resveratrol. Our results also show that the growth-inhibitory effect of resveratrol on melanoma cells is mainly due to its ability to induce S-phase arrest and apoptosis. Taken together, our data indicate that resveratrol is an interesting candidate for the treatment of advanced melanoma. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据