4.7 Article

Effects of dietary astaxanthin and xanthophylls on the growth and skin pigmentation of large yellow croaker Larimichthys croceus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 377-383

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.06.038

关键词

Large yellow croaker; Carotenoid; Skin color; Nutrition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372542]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 9-week feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary astaxanthin and xanthophylls on the growth and skin coloration of large yellow croaker Larimichthys croceus (mean initial weight: 33.33 +/- 1.67 g). There were five experimental diets: CD (control diet without carotenoid), AST37.5 (diet with 37.5 mg/kg of astaxanthin), AST75 (diet with 75 mg/kg of astaxanthin), X37.5 (diet with 37.5 mg/kg of xanthophylls) and X75 (diet with 75 mg/kg of xanthophylls). Results showed that the growth and feed efficiency ratio were not significantly affected by dietary treatments (P>0.05). With the feeding period increased, the lightness (L*) in the dorsal skin showed a slight increase. However, it decreased in the ventral skin (P>0.05). Treatments of X37.5 and X75 had lower redness (a*) in the dorsal skin. As to a* values in the ventral skin, fish fed with carotenoid supplemented diets were higher than that in the CD group. Yellowness (b*) values in the ventral and dorsal skins of fish fed with the carotenoid supplemented diets were elevated as the feeding period increased. Fish in the X37.5 and X75 groups had higher b* values in the ventral and dorsal skins than those in the AST37.5 and AST75 groups (P<0.05). Similarly, X37.5 and X75 groups provided higher carotenoid concentrations in the dorsal and ventral skins than the AST37.5 and AST75 groups. These results suggested that both xanthophylls (Wisdem (R) Golden Y-20) and astaxanthin (Carophyll (R) Pink) were effective carotenoid sources for the skin color improvement of large yellow croaker. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据