4.5 Article

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α/vascular endothelial growth factor axis in astrocytomas.: Associations with microvessel morphometry, proliferation and prognosis

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 267-278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2003.00535.x

关键词

astrocytoma; HIF-1 alpha; proliferation; survival; VEGF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha is a transcription factor that promotes ischaemia-driven angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine the relation of HIF-1alpha to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; an important angiogenic molecule in brain tumours), p53 expression, angiogenesis, proliferative potential and clinical outcome in a large series of diffuse astrocytomas. Expression of HIF-1alpha, VEGF, Ki-67 (a proliferation-associated marker) and p53 was determined immunohistochemically in 83 adult patients with supratentorial diffuse astrocytomas. Microvessels, highlighted by means of anti-CD34 immunohistochemistry, were enumerated with computer-assisted image analysis. Although HIF-1alpha and VEGF were expressed in the majority of cases, their levels increased significantly with increasing grade and proliferative potential. HIF-1alpha positively correlated with microvessel counts and VEGF with total vascular area and the presence of rounder vessel sections. There was a positive correlation of VEGF with p53 expression in astrocytomas and anaplastic astrocytomas. In univariate analysis, both VEGF and HIF-1alpha were associated with shortened survival in the entire cohort, but lost significance when grades II/III and grade IV were analysed separately. Multivariate analysis revealed that the combination of HIF-1alpha with grade was a significant prognostic indicator. HIF-1alpha expression may be used to refine the prognostic information provided by grade in patients with diffuse astrocytomas. Its adverse prognostic effect is most likely mediated by hypoxia, the driving force for HIF-1alpha accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据