4.7 Article

The application of bioflocs technology in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of Marsupenaeus japonicus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 97-106

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.03.034

关键词

Bioflocs technology; Marsupenaeus japonicus; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; High-intensive; Zero exchange

资金

  1. Programme of Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201103034]
  2. Industrial Technology System of Modern Agriculture [nycytx-46]
  3. Public Basical Research of Scientific Research Institutions [2009-cb-01/A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 106-day experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of bioflocs technology for maintaining good water quality, supplying feed nutrition and inhibiting potential pathogen in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of Marsupenaeus japonicus. The experiment was progressed with 2 groups differentiated by bioflocs treatment and relative control in 6 indoor concrete ponds. Sucrose was added to the water of bioflocs treatment ponds based on the amount of daily feed. The monitoring indicated that ammonia-N and nitrite-N concentrations of water in the bioflocs treatment group were significantly lower than the relative control group (P < 0.05). Comparing with the relative control group, the bioflocs treatment resulted in a 41.3% higher shrimp yield, 12.0% higher protein efficiency ratio, and 7.22% lower feed conversion rate. The production of M. japonicus reached to 1.3 kg m(-2) at a body length of 11.33 cm after 106-day farming in the bioflocs treatment group. The predominant microbe analyzed with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was characterized by Bacillus sp. in the bioflocs treatment group, but by Vibrio sp. in the relative control group. It was concluded that bioflocs technology performed well in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of M. japonicus, and the performance may be associated with microbial diversity. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据