4.5 Article

The tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor bis(maltolato)-oxovanadium attenuates myocardial reperfusion injury by opening ATP-sensitive potassium channels

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.062547

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vanadate has been shown to inhibit tyrosine phosphatase, leading to an increased tyrosine phosphorylation state. The latter has been demonstrated to be involved in the signal transduction pathway of ischemic preconditioning, the most potent endogenous mechanism to limit myocardial infarct size. Furthermore, there is evidence that phosphatase inhibition may be cardioprotective when given late after the onset of ischemia, but the mechanism of protection is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the organic vanadate compound bis(maltolato)oxovanadium (BMOV) limits myocardial infarct size by attenuating reperfusion injury and investigated the underlying mechanism. Myocardial infarction was produced in 112 anesthetized rats by a 60-min coronary artery occlusion, and infarct size was determined histochemically after 180 min of reperfusion. Intravenous infusion of BMOV in doses of 3.3, 7.5, and 15 mg/kg i.v. decreased infarct size dose-dependently from 70+/-2% of the area at risk in vehicle-treated rats down to 41+/-5% (P<0.05 versus control), when administered before occlusion. Administration of the low dose just before reperfusion was ineffective, but administration of the higher doses was equally cardioprotective as compared with administration before occlusion. The cardio protection by BMOV was abolished by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein and by the ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP(+)) channel blocker glibenclamide but was not affected by the ganglion blocker hexamethonium. We conclude that BMOV afforded significant cardioprotection principally by limiting reperfusion injury. The mode of action appears to be by opening of cardiac K-ATP(+) channels via increased tyrosine phosphorylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据