4.5 Article

Correlation of different markers (p53, EGF-R, c-erbB-2, Ki-67) expression in the diagnostic biopsies and the corresponding resected tumors in non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 295-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.12.009

关键词

c-erbB-Z; EGF-R; Ki-67; p53; non-small cell lung cancer; immunohistochemistry; neoadjuvant; chemotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Substaging using molecular markers has been proposed to try to identify prognostic factors allowing to define groups of patients with lung cancer for whom specific therapy might be of benefit. The pre-operative assessment of these markers seems to be important specially in case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of our study was to compare the expression of two potential prognostic factors (p53 and Ki-67) and two potential therapeutic targets (EGF-R and c-erbB-2) assessed on biopsy samples (B) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with that of the corresponding resected tumor (RT). The expression of these biological markers was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on B and on the paired RT in 28 patients. The mean percentage of p53 positive cells was 28% in RT and 38% in B with 81% CR between B and RT and 19% FP on B. Considering RT results as standard, the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the B were, respectively, 74 and 100%. The mean percentage of EGF-R positive cells was 11% in RT and 28% in B. With a cut-off of 1%, we found 85% concordant results (CR) between B and RT, 4% false negative (FN) and 11% false positive (FP) on B. The PPV and NPV values of the B were, respectively, 80 and 92%. The 8% B and 19% RT were considered as positive for c-erbB-2. We found 15% FN and 4% FP on B with 81% CR between B and RT for c-erbB-2. The NPV of the B was 83%. The mean percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was 32% in RT and 14% in B. We found 82% CR between B and RT, 14% FN and 4% FP on B. The PPV of the B was 96%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据