4.7 Article

Absorption of different food sources by sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea): Evidence from carbon stable isotope

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 319, 期 1-2, 页码 272-276

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.06.051

关键词

Sea cucumber; Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka); Feeding; Growth; Carbon stable isotope

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871931]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAD13B03, JQ201009]
  3. State Oceanic Administration of China [200905020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present experiment compared the effects of 6 different diet types, including benthic matter collected from natural sea water (diet A), brown algae Sargassum thunbergii (diet B), red algae Gracilaria lemaneiforrnis (diet C), mixture of benthic matter and G. lemaneiformis (diet D), mixture of benthic matter and S. thunbergii (diet E) and mixture of G. lemaneiformis and S. thunbergii (diet F) on the growth of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. The sea cucumber fed mixture diet containing benthic matter showed the higher specific growth rate (SGR) relative to the single feed ingredient and sea cucumbers fed diet D showed the maximum SGR Carbon stable isotope evidence revealed the different feeding preference of sea cucumbers among the various feed ingredients. The results of the present study suggested that G. lemaneiformis might be more preferable to the nutritional requirements of sea cucumber relative to the traditional sea cucumber feed S. thunbergii. G. lemaneiformis which has been widely cultured with higher availability and lower feed cost is suitable for the manufacture of sea cucumber feed in aquaculture practice. Addition of benthic matter collected from the natural sea waters containing microalgae, bacterial and muddy materials is helpful to improve the feeding and absorption of macroalgae by sea cucumber and subsequently to enhance the growth and production of sea cucumber. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据