4.7 Article

Immune response of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus coelomocytes to several immunostimulants in vitro

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 306, 期 1-4, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.024

关键词

Sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus); Immunostimulant; Coelomocyte culture; Immune response

资金

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA100313]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in vitro effects of S-glucan, mannan oligosaccharides (MOS), CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN), lactoferrin and vitamin C on the non-specific immune response of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus coelomocytes were studied. Coelomocytes were cultured in L-15 medium containing different concentrations of beta-glucan (0,5,25 and 100 mu g ml(-1)), CpG ODN (0,0.5,2.5 and 5 mu M), MOS (0,40,80 and 120 mu g ml(-1)), lactoferrin (0, 5, 25 and 100 mu g ml(-1)) and vitamin C (0, 25, 100 and 250 mu g ml(-1)). Coelomocytes were incubated with the above immunostimulants for 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h or 24 h except vitamin C for 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h or 48 h. Coelomocytes incubated in medium without immunostimulants were taken as controls at each incubation time. After exposure to these substances, coelomocytes were sampled and immune parameters viz., phagocytosis, superoxide anion production, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and total nitric oxide synthase (T-NOS) activity were determined. All immune parameters were significantly (P<0.05) enhanced by beta-glucan, MOS and CpG ODN. Lactoferrin induced significant (P<0.05) increase in superoxide anion production and SOD activity of coelomocytes but did not affect phagocytosis and T-NOS activity. Vitamin C significantly (P<0.05) enhanced the SOD and T-NOS activities of coelomocytes while no significant effects were observed in phagocytosis and superoxide anion production. The results suggest that beta-glucan, MOS. CpG ODN, lactoferrin and vitamin C can enhance the non-specific immune response of sea cucumber in vitro. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据