4.5 Article

Muscle mechanical work requirements during normal walking: the energetic cost of raising the body's center-of-mass is significant

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 817-825

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.001

关键词

human walking; forward dynamics simulation; inverted pendulum models; muscle work

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD37996] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inverted pendulum models of walking predict that little muscle work is required for the exchange of body potential and kinetic energy single-limb Support. External power during walking (product of the measured ground reaction force and body center-of-mass (COM) velocity) is often analyzed to deduce net work Output or mechanical energetic cost by muscles. Based on external power analyses and inverted pendulum theory, it has been suggested that a primary mechanical energetic cost may be associated with the mechanical work required to redirect the COM motion at the step-to-step transition. However, these models do not capture the multi-muscle, multi-segmental properties of walking, co-excitation Of muscles to coordinate segmental energetic flow, and simultaneous production of positive and negative muscle work. In this Study, a inuscle-actuated forward dynamic simulation of walking was used to assess whether: (1) potential and kinetic energy of the body are exchanged with little muscle work; (2) external mechanical power can estimate the mechanical energetic cost for muscles, and (3) the net work output and the mechanical energetic cost for muscles occurs mostly in double support. We found that the net work output by muscles cannot be estimated from external power and was the highest when the COM moved upward in early single-limb support even though kinetic and potential energy were exchanged, and Muscle mechanical (and most likely metabolic) energetic cost is dominated not only by the need to redirect the COM in double support but also by the need to raise the COM in single support. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据