4.7 Article

Effects of larval stocking density and feeding regime on larval rearing of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii)

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 300, 期 1-4, 页码 80-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.12.012

关键词

Larval stocking density; Feeding frequency; Growth; Survival; Larval quality; Production efficiency

资金

  1. Belgian Technical Cooperation (BTC) [05VIE/2991]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of larval rearing experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of larval stocking density and feeding regime on larval development, survival, and larval quality of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). For larval density, fixed initial stocking densities (50,100,150 and 200 larvae l(-1)), as well as treatments where larval density changed during the rearing period (in function of the rearing volume), were tested. In the latter trial, initial densities ranged between 100 and 400 larvae l(-1). For the factor feeding regime (based on Artemia nauplii), the effect of both feed ration (1.5, 2, 3 and 4 times the standard feed ration) and feeding frequency (2 or 6 times per day) on larval performance was tested. The results of the experiments showed that larval stocking density and feeding regime strongly affected larval development, survival, and duration of the rearing cycle, as well as larval quality. The best initial larval stocking density when using a constant water volume was 100-150 l(-1), which could be increased up to 400 l(-1) if the water volume was increased during culture. A feeding frequency of 6 times per day using first-stage Artemia nauplii, was more effective than feeding only twice daily. Production efficiency in terms of the number of postlarvae produced per unit rearing volume, and the number of Artemia nauplii used per postlarva produced in the different treatments is discussed. These optimized larval stocking densities and feeding regimes are expected to render freshwater prawn larval rearing more profitable and improve larval quality. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据