4.7 Article

Serum γ-glutamyltransferase and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1427-1432

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1427

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To investigate the association between serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in Japanese male office workers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This study included 2,957 metabolic syndrome-free men and 3,260 nondiabetic men aged 35-59 years who did not have medication for hepatitis, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels higher than three times the upper limit of the reference range, or a history of cardiovascular disease at study entry. Subjects were reexamined at periodic annual health examinations over a 7-year period. We used a modified National Cholesterol Education Program definition of metabolic syndrome with BMI instead of waist circumference and the revised criteria of the American Diabetes Association for type 2 diabetes. RESULTS - With adjustment for age, family history of diabetes, BMI, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, regular physical activity (fasting plasma glucose for the risk of type 2 diabetes), and white blood cell (WBC) count, the risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes increased in correlation with the levels of serum GGT, ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase. Additional adjustment for all of the other liver enzymes attenuated these associations, but serum GGT remained a significant risk factor for the risk of both metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (P for trend <0.001 for both). Top one-fifth versus bottom one-fifth relative risks of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes were 2.23 (95% CI 1.51-3.30) and 2.44 (1.34-4.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS - These results indicate that serum GGT may be an important predictor for developing metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据