4.7 Article

Single dose pharmacokinetic study of flofenicol in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus x O. aureus) held in freshwater at 22 °C

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 289, 期 1-2, 页码 129-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.023

关键词

Tilapia; Florfenicol; Pharmacokinetics; Distribution; Elimination

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2003D21501]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Zhuhai City [BC200320016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and elimination of florfenicol in tilapia weighing about 98 g held in freshwater at 22 degrees C were studied after they were given a single oral dose of 10 mg kg(-1) body weight (b.w.). Five fish per sampling point were examined after treatment. Plasma, muscle, liver, kidney, bile and gill were collected and analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Florfenicol was rapidly absorbed from intestine and distributed extensively to extravascular tissues. The maximum concentrations (C(max)) in both plasma and tissues were observed at 12 h (T(max)) and the maximum concentrations in the order of magnitude were bile (10.87 mu g g(-1))>kidney (6.89 mu g g(-1))>muscle (6.88 mu g g(-1))>liver (5.87 mu g g(-1))>plasma (4.46 mu g ml(-1))>gill (3.22 mu g g(-1)). The elimination of florfenicol was rapid in plasma, muscle, liver and gill tissue and relatively slow in kidney and bile. The elimination half-lives (T(1/2 beta)) in the order of magnitude were bile (36.29 h)>kidney (16.62 h)>gill (15.07 h)>liver (13.94 h)>muscle (10.97 h)>plasma (10.03 h). At 24 h after administration, the drug concentrations in both plasma and tissues remained above the effective treatment concentrations, which can be concluded by comparison with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) as listed in literature, thus florfenicol can be considered as an appropriate treatment for common bacterial infections in fish farming. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据