4.7 Article

Dietary protein requirement of juvenile tiger puffer (Takifugu rubripes)

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 287, 期 1-2, 页码 219-222

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.10.021

关键词

Tiger puffer; Takifugu rubripes; Protein requirement; Diets

资金

  1. Basic Research Program of Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [R01-2005-000-10982-0]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06B2516, R01-2005-000-10982-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was Conducted to determine the optimum dietary protein requirement for the growth of juvenile (initial weight, 17.05 +/- 0.17 g) tiger puffer. Five semi-purified diets were formulated with casein to contain graded levels of protein levels of 35, 40, 45, 50 and 55%. Each diet was fed to triplicate groups of the fish in a flow-through system for 8 weeks. After the 8-week feeding trial, growth of fish fed the 40% diet was not significantly different from that of fish fed 45, 50 or 55% dietary protein, but significantly higher than that of fish fed the 35% diet. The lowest feed efficiency Was found in fish groups fed 35% diet, Protein efficiency ratio of fish fed the 45, 50 and 55% diets was significantly lower than that of fish fed the 35 and 40% diets. No significant differences were observed in feed intake and Survival among all the fish groups. Serum aspartate aminotransferase activity of fish fed the 45% diet was significantly lower than that of fish fed the 35% diet. but was not significantly different from that of fish fed the 40, 50 and 55% diets. Whole body protein content of fish fed the 50 and 55% diets was significantly higher than that of fish fed the 35% diet, but was not significantly different from that of fish fed the 40 and 45% diets. This result indicates that juvenile tiger puffer requires approximately 41% dietary protein for optimum growth and physiological performances. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据