4.7 Article

Chinese herbs (Astragalus membranaceus and Lonicera japonica) and boron enhance the non-specific immune response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 275, 期 1-4, 页码 26-33

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.12.022

关键词

Astragalus membranaceus; Lonicera japonica; boron; Oreochromis niloticus; non-specific immunity; disease resistance; Aeromonas hydrophila

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of two Chinese medicinal herbs (Astragalus membranaceus and Lonicera japonica) and boron on non-specific immune response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) was investigated. Five diet variations in addition to a control diet (without herbs or boron) were used. These contained 0, 1 % Astragalus (with and without 0,05% boron), 0, 1 % Lonicera (with or without 0,05% boron) and a mixture of the two herbs with 0,05% boron. The diets were fed for four weeks, and respiratory burst and phagocytic activities of blood leukocytes; plasma lysozyme, total protein and total immunoglobulin level were measured weekly. After four weeks of feeding, fish were infected with Aeromonas hydrophila and mortalities were recorded. Results of this study showed that feeding tilapia with two herbs alone or in combination significantly enhanced phagocytic and respiratory burst activity of blood phagocytic cells. They had a moderate effect on the plasma lysozyme level and no effect on plasma total protein and total immunoglobulin level. Both herbs reduced the mortality following A. hydrophila infection. The lowest mortality was observed in the group fed with the combination of both herbs and boron. Combination of the herbs and boron could even more increase the survival rate of infected fish. It can be concluded that Astragalus and Lonicera extracts and boron supplementation added to fish feed can act as immunostimulants and enhance the immune response and disease resistance of cultured fish. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据