4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Generation of the highest continuous magnetic fields

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1245-1252

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2004.830543

关键词

generation of high magnetic fields; high-temperature superconductors; nonsuperconducting magnets; resistive magnets; superconducting magnets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of the highest magnetic fields is a true challenge to the magnet designer and a stimulus for the materials scientist. Record fields are achieved through a successful interplay between the precise understanding of the physics of magnets, the detailed knowledge and conscious use of the available materials, and a design that optimizes all the different parameters. We describe three technologies essential for the generation of the highest magnetic fields: coils wound from high-temperature superconductors (HTS) operated at liquid helium temperatures in a background field; high-power resistive magnets; and hybrid magnets, which combine the advantages of resistive and superconducting magnets. HTS show high current densities at elevated fields confirmed so far by measurements up to 33 T. In spite of the strain limitation of the conductor, insert coils up to 3.2 T have been built at different laboratories for a total field of 23.5 T. Recently a record field of 25 T using a 5 T Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox superconducting insert coil has been achieved at the NHMFL. For resistive magnets, dramatic improvements in magnet design, such as the Florida-Bitter magnet, and new materials, such as the microcomposite CuAg, have made it possible that magnetic fields can now be generated that exceed the fields that hybrid magnets produced 10 years ago. Today, 33 T are provided on a routine basis with resistive magnets. The highest continuous magnetic field ever of 45 T is obtained with a new generation of hybrid magnets. It is available for scientific research in our user facility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据