3.9 Article

Interest of interferon alpha in systemic mastocytosis.: The French experience and review of the literature

期刊

PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 294-299

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.04.012

关键词

systemic mastocytosis; mast cell; interferon alpha; 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) are defined by an abnormal growth and accumulation of mast cells in bone marrow and/or other extracutaneous organs. There is currently no cure for this disease. Because of similarities and/or association of mastocytosis with myeloproliferative disorders, interferon alpha has been tested but with contradictory reported results. A first prospective multicenter phase II trial was then started in France. From 1994 to 1997, 20 adult patients with confirmed bone marrow involvement received interferon -2b, for at least 6 months, (from 1 million U per day up to 5 million U/m(2)/day). Thirteen patients who presented systemic and/or specific cutaneous manifestations, demonstrated objective responses: seven (35%) were partial, six (30%) minor but no complete response could be observed at the time of analysis. The bone marrow remained unchanged in 12/13. Thus, interferon should be offered to patients with severe systemic manifestations, who have not responded to symptomatic therapies, even in case of non-aggressive mastocytosis, with or without corticosteroids the first weeks. Long-term therapy should be offered to patients with initial positive response. To control more aggressive SM or mastocytosis associated with clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage or leukaemia mast cell, other chemotherapeutic regimens should be proposed like Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CDA) or polychemotherapies including interferon as it is being tested in France in a new multicentric protocol, coordinated by the association AFIRMM, with interferon and oral cytarabine. (C) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据