4.1 Article

Use of a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based fluorogenic 5′ nuclease assay to evaluate insect vectors of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infections in horses

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 829-834

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.829

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To develop and use a sensitive molecular assay for detecting The phospholipase D (PLD) exotoxin gene of Corynebacterium pseudo tuberculosis in an attempt to identify insect vectors that may be important in transmission of clinical disease in horses. Sample Population-2,621 flies of various species. Procedure-A real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based fluorogenic 5' nuclease (TacqMan) system (ie, TaqMan PCR assay) was developed for the detection of the PLD gene in insects. Flies were collected monthly (May to November 2002) from 5 farms in northern California where C pseudo tuberculosis infection in horses is endemic. Three of the 5 farms (which housed a total of 358 horses) had diseased horses during the study period. A total of 2,621 flies of various species were tested for the PLD gene of C pseudotuberculosis. Results-Evidence of bacterial DNA for the PLD gene was detected in skin biopsy specimens from clinically affected horses and from 3 fly species collected from farms where affected horses were housed. Farms with a high incidence of diseased horses had a high proportion of insects carrying the organism. High percentages of flies with positive results for the PLD gene were observed in October when most clinically affected horses were observed. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that C pseudotuberculosis may be vectored to horses by flies. Three potential vectors were identified, including Haematobia irritans, Stomoxys calcitrans, and Musca domestica. The organism can be identified in up to 20% of house flies (Musca domestica) in the vicinity of diseased horses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据